gopal sankaranarayanan

kaala coat, seedhi baat.

Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India. Argued the PILs against the police action on the 20 July Sansad Chalo march before the Delhi High Court — told the bench he had personally watched 110 videos of the crackdown, cited the Ramlila Maidan judgment making tear gas a measure of last resort, and pressed for an SIT, FIRs against the officers involved and a judicial inquiry. The court issued notice and ordered all CCTV and video records preserved.

1 CLIP(S) ON FILE3 LINKED SOURCE(S)

§ 01 — ON THE MIC

what they said

2/2 LINKED

told the court his team had examined over 130 videos of the crackdown, finding excessive force, personnel without name tags and allegedly unauthorised weapons.

DELHI HIGH COURT · 22 JUL 2026IANS · VIA PROKERALA ↗

“apart from an SIT and FIR, we need to have a judicial inquiry as well.”

IN OPEN COURT, DELHI HC · 22 JUL 2026THEPRINT ↗

§ 02 — THE RECEIPTS

proof of good

1/1 LINKED

gopal_hc_argument.mp4

argues the crackdown PILs before the delhi high court: 110 videos, lathis with nails, tear gas thrown at families.

22 JUL 2026 · DELHI HIGH COURTBAR & BENCH COURT STREAM · VIA X ↗